Sharon Stone retains iconic Basic Instinct scene against legal advice

Sharon Stone reflects on the iconic “Basic Instinct” leg-crossing scene, revealing why she chose not to remove it despite having the legal right to do so at the time. The controversial moment made her an icon but didn’t earn her respect, according to Stone. The director, Paul Verhoeven, was hesitant to show her the scene, but Stone decided not to have it removed as she believed it enhanced the film.

In her memoir “The Beauty of Living Twice,” Stone detailed the behind-the-scenes drama surrounding the scene. She explained that the shot would have given the film an X rating at the time and was not legally permissible by the Screen Actors Guild. Stone ultimately decided to keep the scene in the movie because she felt it was essential for the character and the film’s artistic integrity.

Stone also shared insights into her casting process for the role of Catherine Tramell in “Basic Instinct.” She revealed that Michael Douglas initially had reservations about working with her, as he preferred not to star alongside an unknown actor. However, their initial disagreements and tensions ultimately contributed to their on-screen chemistry and the success of the film.

Despite some conflicting recollections of their initial meeting, Stone and Douglas developed a professional relationship while promoting the movie. Stone noted that their disagreements and interactions outside of filming helped enhance their dynamic on screen.

The actress also addressed the controversy surrounding her casting, emphasizing that the tension between her and Douglas added depth to their performances. The pair’s on-screen chemistry was fueled by their off-screen dynamic, contributing to the success and lasting legacy of “Basic Instinct.”

Overall, Stone’s reflections offer a unique perspective on the making of the film and the challenges she faced during its production. Her candid revelations shed light on the complexities of Hollywood filmmaking and the intricacies of on-screen relationships.

It was intriguing for the character as Michael possessed a temper, which didn’t faze me. This aspect of our dynamic worked exceptionally well. Over time, we developed a strong friendship that continues to this day. I have great admiration for him.